Prolog to this post. My first ‘big truck’ job was with a small regional fast freight expediter based in Michigan. At the time – Michigan max truck speed was 55mph. Although I held a CDL A, being low experience, I was assigned a 24′ box straight truck. The truck was governed out at 55. However, I was dispatched with many deliveries to other states with much higher truck speeds. Often I was the slowest truck, actually slowest ANYTHING on the highway. In my opinion, what I learned then, was limiting a truck’s speed to slower than traffic flow is a major safety issue. But that is my opinion.
No links on this page are affiliated with TruckStopReport.com. User assumes all risks and liabilities for following them.
A long-awaited federal regulation to mandate speed limiters in heavy trucks continues to spark heated debate. Here’s the current landscape:
đ§Š Whatâs Happening (and Not Happening)
-
Not final yet: The FMCSA is expected to publish a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) in MayâŻ2025, targeting vehicles >âŻ26,000âŻlb with engine control units (ECUs) capable of governing speed Premier Expediters Inc.+8Overdrive+8Truckinginfo+8mccrarencompliance.com+6reginfo.gov+6Overdrive+6.
-
No enforcement yet: Thereâs no active mandate â only a proposal that could follow after the May issue. Implementation could span 6â24 months after finalization dotoperatingauthority.com.
-
Back-and-forth in the past: These speed limiter rules were first floated in 2016, later revived around 2022, and then delayed â with OIRA handling reviews within the White House Truckstop.
-
Trump-era rollback?: Although there were discussions of rollback during the Trump administration, this didnât formally stop the rulemakingâcurrent administration maintains it’s still in process .
đ Pros: Why Some Back It
-
Crash safety
Trucks with speed limiters tend to be involved in fewer highâspeed crashes. They reduce severity in collisions and lower risks of jackknifing or rollovers OTR Solutions+12Barrera Law Group LLC+12FreightWaves+12. -
Fuel efficiency & emissions
Capping speeds in the 60â68âŻmph range saves fuel and reduces COâ output â a win for carriers and the environment dotoperatingauthority.comPremier Expediters Inc.+1dotoperatingauthority.com+1. -
Uniform standards
A national standard simplifies compliance, especially for large fleets already using ECUs, and could raise overall highway safety consistency reginfo.gov+15Truckstop+15dotoperatingauthority.com+15.
đ Cons: Criticsâ Viewpoints
-
Traffic disparity & safety risks
Owner-operators argue speed limiters increase dangerous speed differentials, forcing cars to overtake more and potentially causing accidents Barrera Law Group LLC+1dotoperatingauthority.com+1Land Line Media+4Truckinginfo+4Truckstop+4. -
Economic impact
Lower truck speeds could slow freight delivery, requiring more drivers or vehicles to maintain throughput â raising costs Tech.co+7Truckinginfo+7FreightWaves+7. -
Federal overreach
Some lawmakers and trucking groups assert speed should be managed by states. Bills like the DRIVE Act, now in both House and Senate, aim to block any federal speed limiter mandate Overdrive+3Truckinginfo+3Land Line Media+3.
đşđ¸ Where the Federal Government Stands
-
FMCSA & DOT
They continue with rulemaking toward a May 2025 proposal that would require motorâcarrierâbased activation of speed limiters on qualifying trucks Truckinginfo+8reginfo.gov+8Truckstop+8. -
Congressional resistance
The DRIVE Act (spearheaded by Rep. Brecheen and Sen. Daines) would legally forbid the FMCSA from enforcing such mandates. It currently has notable support in the Republican caucus, though its ultimate passage is still unclear Land Line Media+2FreightWaves+2Overdrive+2. -
Political timing
Rulemaking pace often slows in election years. A leadership shake-up or changes in OIRAâs review could further delay or weaken the rule Truckstop+1Overdrive+1.
đ§ The Road Ahead
Milestone | What It Means |
---|---|
May 2025 | FMCSA likely releases formal speed limiter proposal |
6â24 months later | Potential compliance deadline if rule finalized |
DRIVE Act passage | Could block rule entirely or limit FMCSA authority |
Next administration | A change in presidency could restart or kill the rule |
âď¸ Final Take
The speed limiter mandate for >26,000âŻlb trucks is not lawâyet. It sits at a crossroads of safety benefits and economic concerns. Large fleets stand ready with technology in place, but smaller carriers fear federal mandates would hurt efficiency and increase risk on highways. When the proposal officially lands in MayâŻ2025, expect a fierce regulatory and legislative battle.
đ What Should Stakeholders Do Now?
-
Fleets: Audit current ECU configurations and consider trialing speed limiter settings (60â68âŻmph).
-
Drivers / OwnerâOps: Keep close eye on FMCSA updates and lend your voice in comment periods.
-
Shippers: Factor potential transit delays into timelines and contracts.
Comments